Notional Dogma is Dangerous

Dogma Affect Syndrome (DAS) a family a/o cultural nurture problem that will emaciate human reason. DAS persons reason with dogma, which causes amoral nature compliance with dogma.

Democracy Revolution Periods by Alba Pict, 20160101, Open Content / Concepts

USA, "We The People" Periods of History - Revolutionary War 1st Enfranchise Movement (EM), Civil War 2nd EM, Aristocracy WWar1 3rd EM, Women's Rights 4th EM, Totalitarian WWar2 5th EM, Civil Rights 6th EM, Sovereign Nations 7th EM, Citizen Isocracy 8th EM to end super Entitled Global Oligarchy (super EGO) dogma affect of US, EU, RU….

Each EM period has the same domestic & foreign enemy, which is the super. EGO members. The super EGO dogma always falsely legitimizes oppression, exploitation slavery, war, hate, instability, debt… by providing themselves and gullible others plausible causes, gods, solutions … that feed the super EGO bloat history.

Democracy Revolution Periods have objective/ideal end points with no actual historical end. The USA Isocracy is an ideal and always requires lifecycle evolution and sustainment. Enfranchisement is never free or assured for progeny and posterity. Our Democratic Revolution is Alive and Immortal.

Notional Human Intelligence

Notional Human Intelligence
Request For Comment (RFC)
20151015@0835HrStart

Children are smarter than adults?  Yes
Why are children smarter than adults?  Children think in irrational possibilities.Don't adults think in possibilities?  No, rational adults think in probabilities.

I can accept your foundation as acceptably accurate, but the derivatives from these fundamentals are not possible.  Well to say something is impossible is as irrational as saying something is possible without factual evidence. 

Okay then; Those derivations from your MuseSpew ain't dang likely, because adults are smarter than children.  No, Children are smarter.  Adults are simply better at predicting outcomes that are based on learning and experience.  Well...; Adults frequently do childishly express "without much knowledge or experience" possibilities they tag as predictions.  And child-like adults, unable to determine right and wrong of results, provide farcical proofs of outcomes and believable myth.

So, you're stating that children are smarter than adults, and that adults are no better than irrational children?

Yes, adults are defined by their culture and age.  Adults are not defined by knowledge, skills/abilities, experience, merit, performance ....  So, likeable children are frequently likable adults, sad playground bullies ... creative happy children become adults.  The two or more decades of transition to a rational adult depend on their acquisition of knowledge and experience for rationality.  Children develop rationality by experiential explicit (results repeat) a/o vicarious implicit (school, home ...) lessons.

Now you're saying, decades of growing up and going to school may result in irrational and stupid adults? Well Yes; Children always accept or reject observed a/o learned results as they grow. Curiosity is a recognitions of reasoning conflict (problem) that must be resolved, curiosity causes mental and emotional discomfort.  Solutions with consistent repeatable results are like opiates (pain killers) to the brains of curious children and are highly addictive.  The easy dogmatic / irrational (cultural, political, religious ...) believable solutions are as decidedly addictive as the far more complex rational (science, engineering, logic ...) solutions, which require rigorous consistent reproducible results.

So you think, curiosity is essential to rationality?  No, I think, curiosity addiction is the root cause of adults predicting results.  Rationality is indicated by an adult whose predictions a/o solutions are consistent and reliable, obviously.  Politicians, clerics, children are irrational.  Allowances are made for children being irrational, but with politicians, clerics ... adults' dogma providing nice believable explanations, the frighteningly unpredictable results that can devastate, maybe destroy, civilizations.  Obviously allowances made for children are because the impact is typically an insignificant lesson, but irrational adults are a lethal threat and danger to every living thing.

Dang, now you're saying adults are stupid, irrational, and a threat to humanity, their nation and civilization.  Well ...; Obviously Yes, stupid and irrational adults are a significant and probably lethal threat, but our culture and their age frequently define these adults as sane and upstanding members of society (not a threat).  We even frock them with leadership or ask their advice, when obviously we should consider them as mentally and emotionally handicapped and mitigate, medicate, a/o control their risky/threat nature.

Okay, We have gotten sidetracked by crazy adults.  The topic is "Human Intelligence" and the original question was "Children are smarter than adults?"

Should I continue this δmuse ...?

# Eclectic

Open Office Environment [Futurist]

Open Office Environment (OOE) [Futurist]: No assigned space for an employee. OOE size is office=community (space=small...space=large). OOE has shared and reserved easily movable furniture that floats across the office space to meet community and mission needs, personnel schedules/flextime, from day-to-week project events. The boss is never isolated in an office. The workspace in a virtual environment from home, hotel .... Everyone has headsets/earbuds spaces have directional sound canceling spaces. Wall surfaces are promotional, project, mood, MOOC/recreation ... and mobile display surfaces. Office video/audio telecommunication collaborations (VTC future) are by community entertainment center and personal devices (tablets, phones ...). Available spectrum and technology performance assured for everyone (not just the boss). The Open Office Environment (OOE) is not a return to the regimented secretarial pool open work space .... Should I continue?

http://www.fastcompany.com/3040477/the-future-of-work/how-your-miserable-open-office-might-change-this-year
https://www.govloop.com/community/blog/stay-positive-open-work-space/
http://99u.com/articles/16408/how-to-build-a-collaborative-office-space-like-pixar-and-google
https://joinopenworks.com/
https://www.google.com/search?q=Open+collaborative+community+office&num=40&newwindow=1&site=webhp&tbm=isch

What comes first information or technology?

Objective: Cyberspace Multimodal Complex Systems:
Vision: Information causes culture change and advantages, and how technology is applied.
Legacy: Technology causes culture change and advantages, and how information is applied.

I remain very concerned that there is an oversight/gap in the subject spectrum under cyberspace, virtual reality, cloud, networking-centrics, information technology, information assurance ... ... ....

I will always define Internet as cyberspace Infrastructure (Telecommunications) as an FCC governance domain, and WWW, W3 ..., as cyberspace WebServices (World Culture and Commerce) as DoState governance domain. This is far more logical than present USA cyberspace governance (IMO). Domain Macrocosms (.Gov, .Com, .Mil ...) and cloudy, Intranets, *aaS ... microcosms are collaborative community based Infrastructure and WebServices.

Cyberspace & Cyberwar Essence: Information assurance against loss, denial, corruption ... is the critical priority. Infrastructure for access, storage, distribution ... is the important priority.

Information as material is the oversight/gap (IMO). Until "Information" (data, content, meta* ...) is understood to be the material (cargo, resource, product ...) that justifies all funding, security, value ..., there is (I suspect) very little that can be defined for Cyberspace and Information lifecycle strategies.

Cyberspace makes IT, IA, IM, IS, KM ... feel powerful, ethereal, and elusive. Cyberspace is a good global tag for what needs to be done, as good as other past tags; So, keep the global tag. Clearly define that cyberspace never was or will ever be ethereal a/o elusive. Think digitally defined society, communities, libraries, medical and probate records, Map/GIS data ... ... ... as material (Real, not ethereal) for science, engineering, arts and entertainment, strategy and logistics ... ... ... merchandise (Usable, not elusive) communities.

Cyberspace Information Fundamental Standards (XML, UML, BPMaps ...) make Cyberspace valuable and governable (Information Security/Control) by information steward/owner W3 services applications (DB*, CMS, BWf ...). This is the only way to lockdown information after an adversary gains network/domain access. Cyberspace Catastrophe Recovery needs to focus equally on recovery for information audit/losses and infrastructure (servers, systems, platforms). IOW: Anytime there is infrastructure without commerce (information), there is a risk and waste of money. Information architecture, structure, availability and demands defines how technology needs to be applied for stable long lifecycle collaborative communities, culture, and advantages.

Cyberspace is the "Information" environment. Information is the population of bits, bytes, text, words, pixels ... for sentient relationship families, group associations, collaborative values, community strengths.... Telecommunications, the IT part of the environment is the commerce and transport (bridges, routers, gateway borders, AirPort Base Stations ...) infrastructure with Applications/Programs governing, administrating, controlling flow and tolls in cyberspace. Standards and Protocols are packaging, containers, trucks for moving the products, cargo, and containers across the IT infrastructure. Information Service Applications/Programs (post compile & install) are the information handling and packaging, fuel and tools for production and delivery. IN FACT "Information" is the population (of people, trees, cats, dogs ... music, movies ...) and organic material (not iron, plastic, glass ...) building all cyberspace. IN FACT "Infrastructure" the internet is the very real user connection to an amorphous cyberspace environment frequently populated by equivocal information.

Information is created for human consumption in the real world. Information exist in the cyberspace environment for allocation, aggregating, analysis, augmentation, archiving.... Moving information, material, products from the cyberspace environment to the real environment can happen at almost the speed of light and the complexity of that transport, exchange, transaction ... is every bit as complex and problematic as moving iron ore to a refinery industry, then to a paper clip manufacturer, then to a wholesaler, then to a distributor, then to retail ...; Okay, you get it.

Information has sustenance value for people in the real world. People (home, government, business, military ...) and information are symbiotically related for environment evolution and personal success. If a workflow or Process-Map application is developed, then it is developed for specific information that will be stored, manipulated, augmented to meet Workflow ... Process-Map requirements of the human, organizations, work, and production requirements. Designing "Information Services" architectures to leverage information material by handling/services requirements, specifications and capabilities with the end-item information product clearly understood makes the difference between resources saved and reused –or– GIGO & OneOff waste with escalating cost. Science, technology, industry and business processes, products and systems lifecycles ... all depend on the efficacious availability and sharing of "Information." IOW: IT ain't about the dang systems, platform, services ... technology.

Think about the "information" (as too) what value, what needs, who uses, why needed, how to reuse.... After clearly defining customer, users, employees, community, sources, processes, controls, repositories ... for "INFORMATION" requirements; Then, you can design an information architecture that will have an affordably lifecycle and strategy, and enduringly meet customers'/users' needs for information. People Need Information. Focusing on why, who, what, when, where ... about the "information needed" is the start of sensible modular complex systems architecture.

If you can mentally see, sense, feel ... cyberspace as an environment, then you are a cyberspace scientist, engineer, architect.... If cyberspace is technology and systems then you are a technology IT, IA, IM ... specialist (brick-layer, carpenter, general contractor ...). As always, in the real environment, both are highly respectable skill sets, but one set can create/design ... strategize; While, the other can build, troubleshoot, repair.... IOW: For cyberwar in a cyberspace you need both type of skill sets.

Vendors must be contractually required to comply with:
(1) "Open" Standards, protocols, Source Code... in hardware, software, information structure.
(2) Unfettered Extensibility of hardware and software platforms, and information products.
(3) Unfettered Information Interoperability.
(4) Unfettered User Information.
(5) Unfettered *aaServices (*) [Software, Platform, BigDB, Information... Everything].
(6) Unfettered cyberspace/cloud environments.
(7) Unfettered "Open" markets lifecycle maintenance and sustainment competition.
(8) Heterogeneous products provide interoperability & extensibility translators/converters.
Organization/Customer must be contractually required to provide audited accountability:
(1) Experienced professional Science & Technology fellows for acceptance of deliverables.
(2) Experienced professional Science & Technology fellows to govern project performance.

Anyway, Obviously, I am interested in the question: What comes first in cyberspace information or technology?  Discussion from an anthropology, S&T History ... Ontology ... any direction could be interesting and I hope helpful.

Information Material for processes and production in Cyberspace

I remain very concerned that there is an oversight/gap in the subject spectrum under cyberspace, virtual reality, cloud, networking-centrics, information technology, information assurance ...   ...   ....

Information as material is the oversight/gap (IMO).  Until "Information" (data, content, meta* ...) is understood to be the material (cargo, resource, product ...) that justifies all funding, security, value ..., there is (I suspect) very little that can be defined for Cyberspace and Information lifecycle strategies. 

I will always define Internet as cyberspace Infrastructure (Telecommunications) as FCC governance domain, and WWW, W3 ... as cyberspace WebServices (World Culture and Commerce) as DoS governance domain.  This is far more logical than present USA cyberspace governance.

Cyberspace makes IT, IA, IM, IS, KM ... feel powerful, ethereal, and elusive.  Cyberspace is a good global tag for what needs to be done, as good as past other tags; So, keep the global tag, and clearly define that cyberspace never was or will ever be ethereal and elusive.  Think society, communities, libraries, medical and probate records ...   ...   ... as material (not ethereal).

Cyberspace is the "Information" environment.  Information is the sentient population of bits, bytes, text, words, pixels ... relationship families, group associations, collaborative values, community strengths ....  Telecommunications, the IT part of the environment is the commerce and transport (bridges, routers, gateway borders, AirPort Base Stations ...) infrastructure with Applications/Programs governing, administrating, controlling flow and tolls in cyberspace.  Standards and Protocols are packaging, containers, trucks for moving the products, cargo, and containers across the IT infrastructure.  Information Applications/Programs (post compile & install) are the handling and packaging fuel and tools of product production and WebServices delivery.  IN FACT "Information" is the essential population (of people, trees, cats, dogs ... music, movies ...) and product material (not iron, plastic, glass ...) of all cyberspace. 

Information is created for human consumption in the real world.  Information exist in the cyberspace environment for allocation, aggregating, analysis, augmentation, archiving ....  Moving information, material, products from the cyberspace environment to the real environment can happen at almost the speed of light and the complexity of that transport, exchange, transaction ... is every bit as complex and problematic as moving iron to a refinery industry, then to a paper clip manufacturer, then to a wholesaler, then to a distributor, then to retail ...; Okay, you get it.  

Information has sustenance value for people in the real world.  People (home, government, business, military ...) and information are symbiotically related for environment evolution and personal success.  If a workflow or ProcessMap applications is developed, then it is developed for specific information that will be stored, manipulated, augmented to meet Workflow/ProcessMap requirements of the human, organizations, work, and production requirements.  Designing "Information Services" architectures to leverage information material by handling/services requirements, specifications and capabilities with the end-item product clearly understood makes the difference between resources saved and reused –or– GIGO and OneOff waste and escalating cost.  Science, technology, industry and business processes, products and systems lifecycles ... all depend on the efficacious availability and sharing of "Information."  IOW:  IT ain't about the dang systems, platform, services ... technology.  Think about the "INFORMATON" what value, what needs, who uses, why needed, how to reuse ....  After clearly defining customer, users, employees, community, sources, processes, controls, repositories ... for "INFORMATION" requirements; Then, you can design an information architecture that will have an affordably lifecycle and strategy, and enduringly meet customers'/users' needs for information.

People Need Information.  Focusing on why, who, what, when, where ... about the "information needed" is the start of sensible complex systems architecture.

If you can mentally see, sense, feel ... cyberspace as an environment, then you are a cyberspace scientist, engineer, architect ....  If cyberspace is technology and systems, then you are a technology IT, IA, IM ... specialist (brick-layer, carpenter, general contractor ...).  As always, in the real environment, both are highly respectable skill sets, but one set can create/design ... strategize; While, the other can build, troubleshoot, repair ....  IOW: For cyberwar in a cyberspace you need both type of skill sets.

Notional Economics 20150831

                                                                Notional Economics


                                                         Request For Comment (RFC)
                                                            20150824@1200HrStart


Governance of Resources:


The Purpose, of all governments, is to govern resources by stewardship of use and reuse, nothing is ever expendable. Self-stewardship by a reasonable and ethical individual precludes any need for stewardship by a government. The majority aged individual is always considered self-governing and personally responsible for actions a/o failures. Causing resource expendable conditions (War, slavery, throwaway, dumps, pollution, famine, homelessness, physical (body, mind, emotion harm ...) is an economic & environmental crime against humanity. "Crimes against humanity," are punishable by imprisonment in proportion to heinousness of the damage done to the resources, individuals, environment, a/o economy while the expendable conditions exist (IOW: End of Self-stewardship). The mentally ill or diminished persons are never majority aged individuals; Hence, their stewardship passes to the family a/o government.


Governance of Physical Property; Such as, land, houses, buildings, cars, jewelry, weapons... are all considered personal and private property under self-stewardship. Self-stewardship governance rights are transferable, terminable, a/o alterable under the Governance of Resources Rights, Laws, Rules and Responsibilities. When governance alters the Stewardship of physical property the Steward must be appropriately compensated and the compensation must be reviewed in 10 years for adequacy. The Steward's family is considered vested for the 10 year review. The final compensation review will be at 20 years, if Steward's family requested. Exceptions, for 75 years, to a final review can be made when proven events, situations, conditions are considered as preventing a fair and equitable compensation.


For cultural reasons ancestral tribes, groups, communities can request a compensation review every 20 years before the 200 years final compensation review. Equitability for the Stewards and Affordability for the Governing community must be judged best and reasonable. Exceptions to a final review can be made whenever proven events, situations, conditions are considered as preventing a fair and equitable compensation.


Governance of Institutions and Business is required to assure global/national resources are efficaciously used and reused for the health and welfare of the resources (environment) and humanity. Governments, businesses, and institutions failing to protect or fomenting harm to environment and human resources (within their borders) are criminal, as are the individual members. Governments and persons actively harming or attempting any colonial control of resources outside their national borders are committing acts of war, and are considered criminal aggressors. Aggressor Governments or Persons are considered an international threat to the environment and humanity. The international community is responsible for containing, mitigating, and ending the threat to the environment and humanity by all means available including embargo, subversion, war, assassination ... and all other means supported by a pejorative majority of nations.


Governance of War: Aggressors and Defenders are all equally responsible for damages to the environment and people, restitution, reconstruction, and recovery is a global responsibility. Aggressors' overt and covert leaders will be incarcerated for life and all their personal, family, and friend resources (property, art, money ...) will be placed in a global restoration fund. No further restitution or punitive actions are allowed.





Economic Resources Require Reuse:


Resource demands are products and services driven. Resources are circulated [AKA: Consumed] based on desirability [AKA: Need] and availability [AKA: Presence]. Resources are reused. All products (air, food, metal ...) and services (information, medicine, financial ...) must have international standards compliant recycle, recover, and lifecycle circulation plan prior to offering products/services to any customer. Stewardship of resources is local, national, regional, and global. Resources living (humans, animals, plants ...) and lifeless (elements, land, water ...) require global, regional ... stewardship or self-stewardship (people, governments, cultures ...).


Resource Stewards are individuals working for governments, institutions, businesses that directly or by proxy exert actual control upon a resource by decision or action.


Resource Owners are humanity and the environment (other nations) that cannot exert direct or by proxy any control upon a resource.


Individual, Government, Business ... Ownership of Resources (air, land, water, elements, genetics, people ...) is anathema to any human or environment reason. All ownership is based on products a/o services that is human lifecycle transient and transferable by law between individuals and across boundaries.





Real Property Rights (RPR)


The Purpose, of Real Property Rights, is to govern creative and innovative property, by making the creative and innovative artist ownership irrevocable. No government, institution, business, or individual (other than the artist) can claim ownership of creative a/o innovative resources or products. Artist is defined to include Scientist, Mathematicians, Engineers, Musicians, Dancers, Sculptors, Carpenters... IOW: all individual persons that create and innovate products and service value. The physical (stone, metal, clay, paper, space ...) base material and form of the resource cannot be owned by government, institution, business, or individuals, and the artist added creative and innovative value is owned by the artist for life.


The Owner Artist Property Rights




allow the artist to transfer possession of their property for specific time periods that cannot endure after their death. Art transferred by the artist to a government, institution, business, or individual will, after 5 years in other than the artiest possession, be "Open" rights governed. The artist a/o government, institution, business, or individual in possession of artistic property after the death of the artist must assure "Open" public availability of the art at no cost higher than maintenance (curation, restoration, security ...) or transfer the artistic property to others that will professionally maintain or dispose of the art/artifact. Intentional destruction of any art, artifact, information ..., which in the common (science, music ...) art community consensus must be maintained, is a crime against humanity. The art community or group in possession of the art that must be maintain can transfer possession of the art/artifact as is efficacious to maintenance (public museums, vaults ...).


Open Posterity Rights to the original art properties must be protected and maintained. After the death of the artist the art objects (paintings, writings, algorithms, discoveries ...) are governed by "Open" unencumbered access, availability, use, reuse, copy, artistic derivatives.... All derivative art belongs to the offshoot artist. Open Posterity Rights of the original art are interminably.


Open Real Property Rights Database (W3 Internet accessible) allows all people to register, discover, share, and use their registered RPR products and Services. The simple Open rule would apply to all RPR products and services for personal and non-profit/payroll use. When a RPR product or service is used to generate profit or payroll, then a consensus-contract must be agreed upon that courts would find legally equitable for all involved owners and participants. Use of a RPR could not be restricted by the owner (as in automatic use consensus), and the owner would always be legally entitled to equitable compensation for the contributed value.


RPR Use by Person, Library, public University, for Research, learning institutions, community collaboration... would always be free and unencumbered. However, use to make profit, win friends, influence people, generate income, support payrolls, foundations, organizations a/o institutions... without compensating or free-use-permission by the RPR holder would be criminal theft. RPR special rule for the entertainment arts, production, distribution, and publishing industry for a one to seven year limited "Open Content" use-restriction.


RPR sustains change and innovation for a stable and competitive economy and government in our future. Open-content and RPR is about freedom, creativity, and innovation. Open-content and RPR cannot exploit the artist, inventor, author .... Public domain RPR should apply permanently for the good of the public. Publicly funded R&D should remain Public Property just like roads, parks, and rivers. Innovation drives an economic system not capital, capital is a metric-resource (a measuring stick). One example is the persistence of old industrial age Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) concepts for real-physical manufacture of patented and copyrighted products. Governments, corporations, and global law/policy organizations continue the industrial age proto-capitalism and post-feudalism aristocracy a/o plutocrat protection and rewards for a corporatist oligarch economy. The corporatist oligarch economy will eventually be the destruction of both capitalism and democracy with corporatist-political-economics equivalent to communism with more centralization of authority and capabilities occurring by dejure.


General RPR rule basis lies in The U.S. Constitution: Article I; Section 8, A U.S. patent holder enjoys not just ownership of an idea, but also the "exclusive right" to determine how that idea will be presented or marketed to the public. Article I; Section 8 leaves doubt as to how RPR should be interpreted and applied. RPR due to technology and global commerce dynamics in the 21st Century and beyond; creates economic disincentives, for most governments, corporations, individuals, social institutions, and the public good. Present IPR interpretations applied promotes unnecessary litigation, cripples innovations' application, discourages developing new market sectors, and supports profitable anti-competitive tactics that harm global commerce and strong capitalist competition. The present condition is anti-Capitalism, Corporate Welfare, and ... puts non-human patent-holder and copyrights beyond the Artist and public interest. 'Reputable centuries old legal provisions of U.S. patent law; requires judges weigh the public interest against the requested legal action. Original U.S. Constitutional IPR/patents assertions that patents are granted to promote the progress of Humanity, Science, Arts ... in the Public and Government, and economic interest.'





Governance of Capital [Wealth]:


The Purpose, of all Governments, is to equitably govern all capital markets. Governance of capital markets objectives are to regulate (1) Capital Circulation, (2) Monetary Policy, and (3) Budget Policy.


Capital Circulation between Governments (Local, National, International), private citizens, banking institutions, businesses, brokerages... for domestic economic stability. The Government when necessary for economic stability may adjust daily tax rates, expenditures, reserves ... and call for a halt or alter regulatory requirements to any personal, single, set, sector, type, group ... capital transactions.


Monetary Policy is the governance processes by which the supply of money is controlled to regulate inflation and set interest rates to promote domestic economic stability and international trust in currency exchange value. This governance extends to all financial instruments (Stocks, Bonds, Derivatives...) that are issued, exchanged, traded, transferred... within the domestic economy a/o crosses within National borders.


Budget Policy is the governance processes by which (1) Revenues, (2) Surpluses and (3) Deficits are unfunded Government activities. (1) Revenues are Income (Taxes, Fees, Penalties ...). (2) Surpluses are Savings to pay-off debts, (3) Deficits are Losses requiring loans from lenders. NOTE: Debt is an exigency or failure of Budget Policy governance.


Budget Balance requires financial obligations be kept at the level of Revenue Income to prevent Deficits building Debt, and to keep the maximum capital in economic circulation.


Budget Busting are global conditions that prevent Budget Balance; Such as, wars, catastrophes, international contingencies and resource problems....


Budget Obligations are Public Welfare, Government Operations, and National Defense.


Budget Planning priority One is balance. Priority Two pay down debt. Priority Three adjust revenues up for paying down debt. Priority Four keep (when possible) activities and obligations locked down. Priority Five no social or economic disruptions caused by spending reductions.


Budget Governance provides for non-disruptive Public welfare, Government sustainment, and Defense readiness.


Budget Reductions focus science and technology solutions to improve Public Welfare, Government Operations, and Defense Projection. To improve delivery on obligations requires efficacious science and technology application strategy. Budget reductions must pay dividends that bake the unattainable and ever evolving Objective Vision and make actualities happen in increments (days), leaps (years), and bounds (decades). Use modern science and technology to make our future objective vision. IOW: Budget reductions depend on our prior investments creating future returns that control revenue collections / requirements.





Governance is not "Government Intervention."


Governance of a functional economy, when done honestly by the markets (industry, banks, commerce, persons ...), not gamed for profits/greed, will not require "Government Intervention" to govern the economy.


Democracy/Isocracy meritocracy economy provides a standard bell-shape-curve distribution of wealth, benefits, and quality of life (health, education, community [indigent...affluent] ...) inclusive fairness. When significant income and Quality of Life (QoL) disparities exist, Markets' stewards (C*Os, G*Os, groups/families ...) are failures. Private-sector governance is proven unethical or even criminal when there is a skewed wealth-curves of income, property, poverty, religion/race community.... When markets' stewards fail at economic governance, the economic results are depressions, recessions, resource (including human) diaspora.... When economic failures occur, "We The People" as a Government and community must ethically act and economically intervene to stabilize the economy in the interest of National security. For US (the public-sector) this is Governance, for the private-sector this is Government intervention/interference. For a democracy/isocracy National Security essential and required.


Economic failure is never an issue of negatives cancelling deficits or debt. All failures are debt and deficit additive, until good (Private/Public) governance can liquidate the debt. Present private-sector pseudo-capitalism relies on Government handouts, bailouts, and protectionist laws (AKA: Corporate-Welfare Laws) that prevent private-sector corrections by providing corporatist (not capitalist) "no added value" profits. Disruptive economic or governance (Business/Government) incompetence is criminal and cannot be tolerated by any corporate or government institution or persons' machinations. Good public-sector Governance emplaces laws that control the private-sector participation to prevent antitrust, monopolies, fraud, bribery ... unfair labor practices, which cause a dysfunctional economy with contemptible private-sector debt being shifted to the public/government sector [Example: Labor pensions raided by corporate and government criminals].


Government economic intervention is always caused by private-sector economic failures. When a Government is the cause of economic failure, the private-sector will move to another country. National Security interest must act in preventing private-sector manipulation of national politics and elections, laws and policies as essential to good governance and stable economy. There is little difference between private-sector fervor and religious faith, the irrational faith/fervor dogma is circular, and debase Democratic Governments. Beware all special fervor/faith interest with resolutions and truths, because they will not have verifiable/reproducible facts and solutions.


A nation's economic model must promote socio-economic balance or risk collapse. An unbalanced cost of living burden on labor-hands [AKA: wage-slaves] offers no sustainable benefits under faux-capitalism. "Robust Market" advocates will unethical and amoral cheer their good fortune without concern for National Interest, the public-sector QoL impact, and resultant additional national debt. Wealth disparity (US, EU, global ...) is an economics deficiency problem. National resources/wealth removed from circulation in an economy assures some form of collapse within market sectors (S&L, Tech, Housing ...). Governance is the method required to pump money into the failed economy with hope for economic stabilization that will eventually kick-start the functionally deficient economic model.


The USA Republic initially was a timocracy-isocracy democracy mix, with a monetized agrarian-barter economy. The USA Republic presently has a more plutocracy-timocracy democracy mix, with a flour-paper mashie economy. The USA Republic must mature into an isocracy democracy and a capitalist meritocracy economy with the Nations' wealth circulating and equally distributed across three standard deviations from the mean. IOW: All the wealth belongs to US. If you want to move to another country; then PLEASE, pack your bags and go. FACT: "We The People" do not need greedy wimps whining about their economic value to US.


Laissez-Faire, Laissez Rôle Dés a/o Bonne Chance, are irrational and dysfunctional economic models that dishonestly removes resources from economic circulation into a few private hands. Capitalism must be meritocracy (not aggregation) based and with considerations of needs national resources must be fairly distributed. Capital/resources hording has no merit in any economy, catastrophe, war ... unless some fanatical persons are seeking to incite civil unrest and commit treason.


Should I continue this δmuse ...?


# Eclectic

We do need a new version of capitalism for the jobless future?

Venture:  Information Determines Social Change and Technology Application.

  Legacy:  Technology Determines Social Change and Information Application.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/wp/2015/07/20/we-need-a-new-version-of-capitalism-for-the-jobless-future

 

Modern capitalism, as was aristocratic feudalism, is based on the value associated with metal/property, goods/products, tender/money ....  There are alternatives, but human hubris does complicate the options; The Apt Question, Should we fear the final solution? 

Maybe a little fear will help US, EU ... UN others to sweep away the bequeathed extreme vertical/hierarchical culture for a far better civilization and finally achieve an isocracy governance of institutions/things that have encumbered people and nations with childlike fascination in splendid baubles and illustrious myths of gods, histories, rulers ....

 

Is there still merit in being you, helping others, creating better devices, music, math ... comfort, health, food ... education, science, guidance, sharing, governance ....  Basing value on what you do, what you can do, what you provide in a culture has actual merit far beyond the greedy amassing of faux-power and gluttonous voraciousness for pseudo-wealth.

 

We know; do we have the will, endurance and courage to make US, EU ... UN others better?

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 Tellurian Solar Calendar

Information Architecture δMuse

Information Architecture [δMuse Comments/Notes, not edits/post]
               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_architecture (caused the δMuse visit)

Information Architecture (IA)

Information Services (Analysis, Simulations, Production, Libraries, Relationships, Collaboration ...)
               NOTE:  Security Defined by Information Object Governance and Structured Linkages
Information Management (Administration, Maintenance, Registries, Aggregation, Governance ...)
               NOTE:  Virtual Security Defined by Owners, Stakeholders, Creators, Purposes, Threats ...
Platforms/Systems (Linkages, Exchanges, Warehouses, Distributions, Infrastructure ...)
               NOTE:  Physical Security Defined by Monitoring, Restrictions, Stealth (DarkNameNetworks) ...
               ••• [Ellipsis usage indicates nothing is close-ended a/o presciently unchangeable]

IMO:  IA requirements must address IS, IM, and P/S, while leaving IM and P/S security issues appropriately partitioned.  IS must contain and transfer IM created content and data security requirements, while P/S must securely transport content and data. 

 

Information Sharing Environments (ISE)

Information Services (IS) Harmony (ISH) W3C, ISO ... Activity Specifics and Standards compliance
               Human Usage Content specific (Documents, Pictures, Books, Music, Movies, Government, Engineering ...)
               Machine Usage Data specific (Bits, Bytes, Sensors, Measures, Variables, Algorithms, Manufacturing ...)
               •••
Information Management (IM) Harmony (IMH) W3C, ISO ... Object Specifics and Standards compliance
               Product Objects are "WhatIs" (Books, Applications, Documents ... discrete and explicit artifacts)
               Process Objects are "HowTo" (Organization, Operations, Maps ... discrete and implicit artifacts)
               •••
Platforms/Systems (P/S) Conventions (P/SC) W3C, ISO ... Infrastructure Specifics and Standards compliance
               Open Internet, Intranet, a/o Public systems have Default Access Allowed (DAA)
               Closed Enterprise, Internal a/o Private systems have Default Access Denied (DAD)
               •••
               NOTE:  P/SC Open or Closed is an IA consideration for DAA or DAD. 
                            P/SC does not relate/dictate IA hardware/software ... physical/virtual products selection.  
                            P/SC does require DAA or DAD configuration of products for IA and P/S functional purposes.

The Objective Purpose for Information Architecture (IA)

Information Sharing Environment (ISE), AKA: Information Collaboration Environment (ICE)
               NOTE:  IS, IM, P/S ... Informatics with W3C, ISO ... Standards compliance
                            does supports IA requirements for an ISE. 
               NOTE:  Ontology is Information Science Theory / Implicit.  
                             Informatics is Applied Information Science / Explicit. 
                             For Theory / Implicit there are always HoHa support (IOW: a Hypothetical Precursor). 
                             For Application / Explicit there are always supporting Facts (IOW: a Theoretical Precursor). 
               Why is this important?  Application of a theory with reproducible results is a fact, but
                                                          Application of a hypothesis is risky with no predictable results. 

The Objective Purpose for Information Sharing Environments (ISE)

               Information Derivatives Foundations (IDF) for Communities, Colleagues, Families ...
               NOTE:  Information leveraged post maker development ... sensor collection, analysis, metadata,
                            storage ... then requires structured discovery, suitable assessment, useful aggregation,
                            derivative packaging, distribution/delivery ... to create and edit derivative information in an ISE.
 

The Objective Purpose for Information Derivatives:  Mission, Information Use/Reuse/Recycle....

What is the best BoS, BoA, BoFA ... Degree for future employment?

Maybe a Bachelor of Eclectics (BoE) Degree would be best.
 
IOW:  How best to select a future career in Mathematics, English (national language/culture), Physics, Biology, Music, Engineering, Arts, Programming, Medicine, Chemistry, Philosophy, Informatics, Anthropology ...?  Learn your basics (Math & English) and take two or three vaguely interesting courses in five or six fields of study. 

Probability is you will not have a career in any specific field, until you have your Masters or Doctors degree. So, for that BoS, BoA, BoFA ... degree, be curious and learn about everything (including comics, games, fun, friends ... life).  Even with your Masters or Doctors degree in a specific field, your future career requirements will always remain unknown; Expect, your BoE courses will be of surprising value over four to seven decades. 

When you get your BoE degree, then take an introspective (have more fun) vacation with your, end of vacation, goal being a decision to seek a job or a field. 

As you move into a career, learn explicit career specifics:  How to do a job?  What questions to ask?  What is the organization and functional structure?  What are organic a/o core processes, products, services?  ...?  Yes! Both, the job a/o the field must be approached with great curiosity for the unknowns that you need to work with and learn about.

Nothing will remain the same across years and decades; So, your lifecycle sustainment requires you to be autodidactic and curious about the next unknown in your life a/o career.  Best 1960s' life/ethos saying is "Keep On Moving On." 

Also, accept that bosses, managers, supervisors ... with a Bo* degree and no hands-on experience are frequently (not always) oppressive idiots that want you to find another job.  Best 1960s' career/ethic saying is "Keep On Moving On." 

Oh, most importantly, FAMILY (spouse and kids) comes first; So, do what is best for them and you. 

[Yes, I know there ain't a Bachelor of Eclectics degree. Though, IMO, there should be a BoE degree]

Adelophilia Sapiens are Anomic

Perhaps species differentiation is not as obvious as Neanderthals and Sapien primates.

The 21st Century Extrinsic or Distal Nihilist is an Existentialist?

Extrinsic [exotic, foreign, alien, actual ... as in Unknown] or Distal Nihilist:  All Human values are acquired, learned, derived ... and reveal the human condition. There are no Real Human Values (RHV) other than those parentally/socially imposed on children and perpetuated by proximal adults.  Actual Human Values (AHV) genetically exist.  AHV exist as part of evolution inheritance; Hence, we observe "Value" behaviors in other primates, mammals, and fish ... birds.  Ascription of human values to gods and fear of divinity, dogma ... fantasy retribution abandons reason and freewill; Thereby, enslaving the person to the contrived a/o conniving vaunted values of hubris persons. 

The Distal Nihilist understands unknown fears are irrational and natural.  Naturally (even for humans) unknowns will provoke curiosity, then the seeking to know the unknown.  These natural behaviors have been observed in puppies, kittens, infant primates ... and are essential to evolution.  Yes, babies are not practical they will try to hug a lion or pet an alligator; Therfor, elders (parents, siblings ...) provide practical lessons and inducements that mitigate the risk, which natural curiosity causes.  These practical lessons starts a lifecycle of unquestioning loyalty to family/community authority and an understanding of repercussions.  Guilt as the genetic component (as are most emotions) promotes greater conformity to social strictures.  Repercussions cause suppression (Fear) or repression (Reason) towards curiosity (an emotion).  Fear has real optional responses, then panic, faint, or run. Fear lacks actual Reason skills required within novel/anomalous environments.

Distal Nihilist are existentialist that dismiss the contrived and commonly accepted RHV as easy explanations that patronize persons of faith/myth communities. 

Why do I differentiate with the words "Real" and "Actual" in my discussion (with myself) about "Human Values," because my observations frequently explained value behavior discrepancies (by self and others) with a few sayings/quotes?

1.  Reality is self-induced hallucination.

2.  Reality ain't actuality.
3.  Reality is a personal affliction.
4.  Dogma affected persons cannot reason effective.

Governance of a functional economy

Governance is not "Government Intervention."  Governance of a functional economy, when done honestly by the markets (industry, banks, commerce, persons ...), not gamed for profits/greed, will not require "Government Intervention" to govern the economy.  

 

A healthy meritocracy economy, in a Democracy, provides a standard bell-shape-curve distribution of wealth, benefits, and quality of life (health, education, community [indigent...affluent] ...) inclusive fairness.  Markets' stewards (C*Os, BoTs, and groups/families) fail at ethical private-sector governance when income disparities exist, as indicated by a skewed wealth-curve of income, property, community....  When markets' stewards fail at economic governance, the results are depressions, recessions, resource diaspora....  When economic failures occur, "We The People" as a Government and community must ethically act and economically intervene for the welfare of the Nation.  For US (the public-sector) this is Governance, for the private-sector this is Government intervention/interference.

Economic failure upon failures is not an issue of negatives cancelling.  All failures are debt additive, until good (Private/Public) governance can liquidate the debt.  Present private-sector pseudo-capitalism relies on Government bailouts and protectionist laws (AKA: Corporate-Welfare Laws) that prevent private-sector corrections of functional economic incompetence.  Good public-sector Governance emplaces laws that control the private-sector participation in antitrust, monopolies, fraud, bribery... activities, which cause a dysfunctional economy with contemptible private-sector debt being shifted to the public sector. 

Government economic involvement/intervention is always caused by private-sector economic failures.  When a Government is the cause of economic failure, the private-sector will move to another country; Hence, The "National Security" interest in preventing private-sector manipulation of national politics and elections is essential to good governance and stable economy.  There is not much difference between private-sector fervor and religious faith, the irrational faith/fervor dogma is circular, and participation will debase Democratic Governments.  Beware all special fervor/faith interest with resolutions and truths, because they will not have verifiable/reproducible facts and solutions.

A nation's economic model must promote socio-economic balance or risk collapse.  An unbalanced cost of living burden on labor-hands [AKA: wage-slaves] offers XYZ... benefits, under faux-capitalism.  Market advocates will unethical and amoral cheer their good fortune without concern for National Interest or the public-sector impact and resultant debt.  Wealth disparity (US, EU, global ...) is an economic functional deficiency problem.  National resources/wealth removed from circulation in an economy assures some form of capital collapse within market sectors (S&L, Tech, Housing ...).  Governance is the method required to pump money into the failed economy with hope for economic stabilization that will eventually kick-start the functionally deficient economic model.

The USA Republic initially was a timocracy-isocracy democracy mix, with a monetized agrarian-barter economy.  The USA Republic presently has a more plutocracy-timocracy democracy mix, with a flour-paper mashie economy.  The USA Republic must mature into an isocracy democracy and a capitalist meritocracy economy with the Nations' wealth circulating.  IOW: All the wealth belongs to US.  If you want to move to another country; then PLEASE, pack your bags and go.  FACT: "We The People" do not need greedy wimps whining about their economic value to US.

 
Laissez-Faire, Laissez Rôle Dés a/o Bonne Chance, are irrational and dysfunctional economic models that dishonestly removes resources from economic circulation into a few private hands.  Capitalism must be meritocracy, not aggregation, based.  Capital/resources hording has no merit in any economy, unless some folks are seeking civil unrest without consideration of historical events.

Just a comment on new economics

Why: http://www.alternet.org/education/how-activist-college-kids-are-taking-high-priests-money

A new economics model must study and address the historical, present, and persistent economic problems.  A new model needs to emerge from present model failures/weaknesses, and have an objective economics system clearly defined providing the legacy to objective system lifecycle roadmap.  The lifecycle roadmap would be to assure that there is not another "sit on your laurels" model, because the objective system must always progressively mature and address socio-economic and human-cultural developments. 

IMO, a progressive economics model provides a commons for a society to reasonably distribute community (global...local) resources and wealth/value [1st] Welfare that universally delivers stability (food, housing, health, learning), [2nd] Enfranchisement that provides participatory meritocracy (justice, governance, occupation, options/opportunity), [3rd] Assurance that economics is building an egalitarian society (global...local).   

PseudoMarxist, FauxCapitalist, Classical/NeoClassical and other totalitarian oligarch economics (aristocracy, plutocracy, noocracy, epistocracy ...) are reliably consistent failures that lead to slavery, exploitation, corruption ....   

Future economics models require strong public participation, commitment, and governance.  Because, there will always be a few greed-sick micromaniacal plutocrats trying to by gods of wealth.

Why NetNeutrality?

 

Gothic Geek, Freak, and Nerd Toddlers' Future Careers: Balisage Markup Conference

Why Go...Attend the Balisage Markup Conference?The world of tomorrow will pass you by like your grandparents in the 1980s, unless ....
1980s Workplace networks, computers, and software
1990s Home computers, modems, email, and web-browsers
2000...Present most politicians remain lost and intransigent C*O gophers

 

2020...Future most of US will benefit from Information, but only a few will know and do.
Revelation: Information [affect] induces implicit cultural change.
Reminisce: Technology [effect] enables explicit cultural change.

 

Balisage Markup Conference, 20150810...14, Washington, DC
   http://www.balisage.net
   http://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/index.html(2008...2014)
   http://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol13/contents.html (2014)
   http://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol14/contents.html (2014)

 

Extensible Markup XML / XHTML Language, W3C Standard
   http://www.w3.org/XML
Web Ontology Language (OWL), W3C Standard
   http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-rdf-owl
Unified Modeling Language, OMG Standard
   http://www.uml.org
Business Process Modeling Notation, OMG Standard
   http://www.bpmn.org
Universal Business Language, OASIS Standard
   http://ubl.xml.org
National Information Exchange Model, Standards Compliance W3C, OMG, ISO ...
   https://www.niem.gov
   http://www.omg.org/spec/NIEM-UML/1.0

 

Well, it is just IMO? Information (Digital/Computer) Sciences, Informatics, Library Sciences, Ontological Theory/Algorithms ... Information Sharing Environments (ISE) make US & EU strong, smart, and PDFC00!

Science Fiction Physics Course-110

The Standard Model [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model] of particle physics is a theory concerning the electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear interactions, as well as classifying all the subatomic particles known. It was developed throughout the latter half of the 20th century, as a collaborative effort of scientists around the world.[1] The current formulation was finalized in the mid-1970s upon experimental confirmation of the existence of quarks. Since then, discoveries of the top quark (1995), the tau neutrino (2000), and more recently the Higgs boson (2013), have given further credence to the Standard Model. Because of its success in explaining a wide variety of experimental results, the Standard Model is sometimes regarded as a "theory of almost everything".

Although the Standard Model is believed to be theoretically self-consistent[2] and has demonstrated huge and continued successes in providing experimental predictions, it does leave some phenomena unexplained and it falls short of being a complete theory of fundamental interactions. It does not incorporate the full theory of gravitation[3] as described by general relativity, or account for the accelerating expansion of the universe (as possibly described by dark energy). The model does not contain any viable dark matter particle that possesses all of the required properties deduced from observational cosmology. It also does not incorporate neutrino oscillations (and their non-zero masses).

The development of the Standard Model was driven by theoretical and experimental particle physicists alike. For theorists, the Standard Model is a paradigm of a quantum field theory, which exhibits a wide range of physics including spontaneous symmetry breaking, anomalies, non-perturbative behavior, etc. It is used as a basis for building more exotic models that incorporate hypothetical particles, extra dimensions, and elaborate symmetries (such as supersymmetry) in an attempt to explain experimental results at variance with the Standard Model, such as the existence of dark matter and neutrino oscillations.

The Standard Model of elementary particles, with the three generations of matter, gauge bosons in the fourth column, and the Higgs boson in the fifth.

SciFicPhyCrs110 — ScienceFictionPhysics Course110 — This is not professional science anything, and dogma/godma fantasy is less authoritative. 

DarkEnergy is generated at the edges of TimeSpace.  DarkEnergy, in SpaceTime, is observable at our known universe edges and BlackHoles' event horizons.  Different manifestations of DarkEnergy occur as the Quantum-Horizon dissipates with TimeSpace.  All frequencies/waves are distorted/displaced by matter.  All frequencies/waves in TimeSpace are distorted/displaced by Micro-particles (atoms, molecules ...) and macro-objects (stars, planets ...).

 

SpaceTime is kept coherent by gravity.  DarkEnergy insulates/delays SpaceTime dissipation into the Quantum-Horizon.  Gravity makes SpaceTime coherent providing energy for quanta coalescing into atomic elements...universe.

 

The Quantum seeks a quiescent (smooth fabric) state, but energy is never inert, energy is a potential waiting for release, differences ….  A portion of the fabric knotted with potential, maybe nothing happens, maybe another knotted potential on the fabric creates a potential difference and a Singularity of energy released creating another Universe.  Maybe two Universes collide causing a Singularity.

More edit and ownership is needed, with fabled math skills, but SciFicPhy does not require proof or faith, just fun.