20150824

Notional Economics 20150831




                                                                Notional Economics


                                                         Request For Comment (RFC)
                                                            20150824@1200HrStart


Governance of Resources:


The Purpose, of all governments, is to govern resources by stewardship of use and reuse, nothing is ever expendable. Self-stewardship by a reasonable and ethical individual precludes any need for stewardship by a government. The majority aged individual is always considered self-governing and personally responsible for actions a/o failures. Causing resource expendable conditions (War, slavery, throwaway, dumps, pollution, famine, homelessness, physical (body, mind, emotion harm ...) is an economic & environmental crime against humanity. "Crimes against humanity," are punishable by imprisonment in proportion to heinousness of the damage done to the resources, individuals, environment, a/o economy while the expendable conditions exist (IOW: End of Self-stewardship). The mentally ill or diminished persons are never majority aged individuals; Hence, their stewardship passes to the family a/o government.


Governance of Physical Property; Such as, land, houses, buildings, cars, jewelry, weapons... are all considered personal and private property under self-stewardship. Self-stewardship governance rights are transferable, terminable, a/o alterable under the Governance of Resources Rights, Laws, Rules and Responsibilities. When governance alters the Stewardship of physical property the Steward must be appropriately compensated and the compensation must be reviewed in 10 years for adequacy. The Steward's family is considered vested for the 10 year review. The final compensation review will be at 20 years, if Steward's family requested. Exceptions, for 75 years, to a final review can be made when proven events, situations, conditions are considered as preventing a fair and equitable compensation.


For cultural reasons ancestral tribes, groups, communities can request a compensation review every 20 years before the 200 years final compensation review. Equitability for the Stewards and Affordability for the Governing community must be judged best and reasonable. Exceptions to a final review can be made whenever proven events, situations, conditions are considered as preventing a fair and equitable compensation.


Governance of Institutions and Business is required to assure global/national resources are efficaciously used and reused for the health and welfare of the resources (environment) and humanity. Governments, businesses, and institutions failing to protect or fomenting harm to environment and human resources (within their borders) are criminal, as are the individual members. Governments and persons actively harming or attempting any colonial control of resources outside their national borders are committing acts of war, and are considered criminal aggressors. Aggressor Governments or Persons are considered an international threat to the environment and humanity. The international community is responsible for containing, mitigating, and ending the threat to the environment and humanity by all means available including embargo, subversion, war, assassination ... and all other means supported by a pejorative majority of nations.


Governance of War: Aggressors and Defenders are all equally responsible for damages to the environment and people, restitution, reconstruction, and recovery is a global responsibility. Aggressors' overt and covert leaders will be incarcerated for life and all their personal, family, and friend resources (property, art, money ...) will be placed in a global restoration fund. No further restitution or punitive actions are allowed.





Economic Resources Require Reuse:


Resource demands are products and services driven. Resources are circulated [AKA: Consumed] based on desirability [AKA: Need] and availability [AKA: Presence]. Resources are reused. All products (air, food, metal ...) and services (information, medicine, financial ...) must have international standards compliant recycle, recover, and lifecycle circulation plan prior to offering products/services to any customer. Stewardship of resources is local, national, regional, and global. Resources living (humans, animals, plants ...) and lifeless (elements, land, water ...) require global, regional ... stewardship or self-stewardship (people, governments, cultures ...).


Resource Stewards are individuals working for governments, institutions, businesses that directly or by proxy exert actual control upon a resource by decision or action.


Resource Owners are humanity and the environment (other nations) that cannot exert direct or by proxy any control upon a resource.


Individual, Government, Business ... Ownership of Resources (air, land, water, elements, genetics, people ...) is anathema to any human or environment reason. All ownership is based on products a/o services that is human lifecycle transient and transferable by law between individuals and across boundaries.





Real Property Rights (RPR)


The Purpose, of Real Property Rights, is to govern creative and innovative property, by making the creative and innovative artist ownership irrevocable. No government, institution, business, or individual (other than the artist) can claim ownership of creative a/o innovative resources or products. Artist is defined to include Scientist, Mathematicians, Engineers, Musicians, Dancers, Sculptors, Carpenters... IOW: all individual persons that create and innovate products and service value. The physical (stone, metal, clay, paper, space ...) base material and form of the resource cannot be owned by government, institution, business, or individuals, and the artist added creative and innovative value is owned by the artist for life.


The Owner Artist Property Rights




allow the artist to transfer possession of their property for specific time periods that cannot endure after their death. Art transferred by the artist to a government, institution, business, or individual will, after 5 years in other than the artiest possession, be "Open" rights governed. The artist a/o government, institution, business, or individual in possession of artistic property after the death of the artist must assure "Open" public availability of the art at no cost higher than maintenance (curation, restoration, security ...) or transfer the artistic property to others that will professionally maintain or dispose of the art/artifact. Intentional destruction of any art, artifact, information ..., which in the common (science, music ...) art community consensus must be maintained, is a crime against humanity. The art community or group in possession of the art that must be maintain can transfer possession of the art/artifact as is efficacious to maintenance (public museums, vaults ...).


Open Posterity Rights to the original art properties must be protected and maintained. After the death of the artist the art objects (paintings, writings, algorithms, discoveries ...) are governed by "Open" unencumbered access, availability, use, reuse, copy, artistic derivatives.... All derivative art belongs to the offshoot artist. Open Posterity Rights of the original art are interminably.


Open Real Property Rights Database (W3 Internet accessible) allows all people to register, discover, share, and use their registered RPR products and Services. The simple Open rule would apply to all RPR products and services for personal and non-profit/payroll use. When a RPR product or service is used to generate profit or payroll, then a consensus-contract must be agreed upon that courts would find legally equitable for all involved owners and participants. Use of a RPR could not be restricted by the owner (as in automatic use consensus), and the owner would always be legally entitled to equitable compensation for the contributed value.


RPR Use by Person, Library, public University, for Research, learning institutions, community collaboration... would always be free and unencumbered. However, use to make profit, win friends, influence people, generate income, support payrolls, foundations, organizations a/o institutions... without compensating or free-use-permission by the RPR holder would be criminal theft. RPR special rule for the entertainment arts, production, distribution, and publishing industry for a one to seven year limited "Open Content" use-restriction.


RPR sustains change and innovation for a stable and competitive economy and government in our future. Open-content and RPR is about freedom, creativity, and innovation. Open-content and RPR cannot exploit the artist, inventor, author .... Public domain RPR should apply permanently for the good of the public. Publicly funded R&D should remain Public Property just like roads, parks, and rivers. Innovation drives an economic system not capital, capital is a metric-resource (a measuring stick). One example is the persistence of old industrial age Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) concepts for real-physical manufacture of patented and copyrighted products. Governments, corporations, and global law/policy organizations continue the industrial age proto-capitalism and post-feudalism aristocracy a/o plutocrat protection and rewards for a corporatist oligarch economy. The corporatist oligarch economy will eventually be the destruction of both capitalism and democracy with corporatist-political-economics equivalent to communism with more centralization of authority and capabilities occurring by dejure.


General RPR rule basis lies in The U.S. Constitution: Article I; Section 8, A U.S. patent holder enjoys not just ownership of an idea, but also the "exclusive right" to determine how that idea will be presented or marketed to the public. Article I; Section 8 leaves doubt as to how RPR should be interpreted and applied. RPR due to technology and global commerce dynamics in the 21st Century and beyond; creates economic disincentives, for most governments, corporations, individuals, social institutions, and the public good. Present IPR interpretations applied promotes unnecessary litigation, cripples innovations' application, discourages developing new market sectors, and supports profitable anti-competitive tactics that harm global commerce and strong capitalist competition. The present condition is anti-Capitalism, Corporate Welfare, and ... puts non-human patent-holder and copyrights beyond the Artist and public interest. 'Reputable centuries old legal provisions of U.S. patent law; requires judges weigh the public interest against the requested legal action. Original U.S. Constitutional IPR/patents assertions that patents are granted to promote the progress of Humanity, Science, Arts ... in the Public and Government, and economic interest.'





Governance of Capital [Wealth]:


The Purpose, of all Governments, is to equitably govern all capital markets. Governance of capital markets objectives are to regulate (1) Capital Circulation, (2) Monetary Policy, and (3) Budget Policy.


Capital Circulation between Governments (Local, National, International), private citizens, banking institutions, businesses, brokerages... for domestic economic stability. The Government when necessary for economic stability may adjust daily tax rates, expenditures, reserves ... and call for a halt or alter regulatory requirements to any personal, single, set, sector, type, group ... capital transactions.


Monetary Policy is the governance processes by which the supply of money is controlled to regulate inflation and set interest rates to promote domestic economic stability and international trust in currency exchange value. This governance extends to all financial instruments (Stocks, Bonds, Derivatives...) that are issued, exchanged, traded, transferred... within the domestic economy a/o crosses within National borders.


Budget Policy is the governance processes by which (1) Revenues, (2) Surpluses and (3) Deficits are unfunded Government activities. (1) Revenues are Income (Taxes, Fees, Penalties ...). (2) Surpluses are Savings to pay-off debts, (3) Deficits are Losses requiring loans from lenders. NOTE: Debt is an exigency or failure of Budget Policy governance.


Budget Balance requires financial obligations be kept at the level of Revenue Income to prevent Deficits building Debt, and to keep the maximum capital in economic circulation.


Budget Busting are global conditions that prevent Budget Balance; Such as, wars, catastrophes, international contingencies and resource problems....


Budget Obligations are Public Welfare, Government Operations, and National Defense.


Budget Planning priority One is balance. Priority Two pay down debt. Priority Three adjust revenues up for paying down debt. Priority Four keep (when possible) activities and obligations locked down. Priority Five no social or economic disruptions caused by spending reductions.


Budget Governance provides for non-disruptive Public welfare, Government sustainment, and Defense readiness.


Budget Reductions focus science and technology solutions to improve Public Welfare, Government Operations, and Defense Projection. To improve delivery on obligations requires efficacious science and technology application strategy. Budget reductions must pay dividends that bake the unattainable and ever evolving Objective Vision and make actualities happen in increments (days), leaps (years), and bounds (decades). Use modern science and technology to make our future objective vision. IOW: Budget reductions depend on our prior investments creating future returns that control revenue collections / requirements.





Governance is not "Government Intervention."


Governance of a functional economy, when done honestly by the markets (industry, banks, commerce, persons ...), not gamed for profits/greed, will not require "Government Intervention" to govern the economy.


Democracy/Isocracy meritocracy economy provides a standard bell-shape-curve distribution of wealth, benefits, and quality of life (health, education, community [indigent...affluent] ...) inclusive fairness. When significant income and Quality of Life (QoL) disparities exist, Markets' stewards (C*Os, G*Os, groups/families ...) are failures. Private-sector governance is proven unethical or even criminal when there is a skewed wealth-curves of income, property, poverty, religion/race community.... When markets' stewards fail at economic governance, the economic results are depressions, recessions, resource (including human) diaspora.... When economic failures occur, "We The People" as a Government and community must ethically act and economically intervene to stabilize the economy in the interest of National security. For US (the public-sector) this is Governance, for the private-sector this is Government intervention/interference. For a democracy/isocracy National Security essential and required.


Economic failure is never an issue of negatives cancelling deficits or debt. All failures are debt and deficit additive, until good (Private/Public) governance can liquidate the debt. Present private-sector pseudo-capitalism relies on Government handouts, bailouts, and protectionist laws (AKA: Corporate-Welfare Laws) that prevent private-sector corrections by providing corporatist (not capitalist) "no added value" profits. Disruptive economic or governance (Business/Government) incompetence is criminal and cannot be tolerated by any corporate or government institution or persons' machinations. Good public-sector Governance emplaces laws that control the private-sector participation to prevent antitrust, monopolies, fraud, bribery ... unfair labor practices, which cause a dysfunctional economy with contemptible private-sector debt being shifted to the public/government sector [Example: Labor pensions raided by corporate and government criminals].


Government economic intervention is always caused by private-sector economic failures. When a Government is the cause of economic failure, the private-sector will move to another country. National Security interest must act in preventing private-sector manipulation of national politics and elections, laws and policies as essential to good governance and stable economy. There is little difference between private-sector fervor and religious faith, the irrational faith/fervor dogma is circular, and debase Democratic Governments. Beware all special fervor/faith interest with resolutions and truths, because they will not have verifiable/reproducible facts and solutions.


A nation's economic model must promote socio-economic balance or risk collapse. An unbalanced cost of living burden on labor-hands [AKA: wage-slaves] offers no sustainable benefits under faux-capitalism. "Robust Market" advocates will unethical and amoral cheer their good fortune without concern for National Interest, the public-sector QoL impact, and resultant additional national debt. Wealth disparity (US, EU, global ...) is an economics deficiency problem. National resources/wealth removed from circulation in an economy assures some form of collapse within market sectors (S&L, Tech, Housing ...). Governance is the method required to pump money into the failed economy with hope for economic stabilization that will eventually kick-start the functionally deficient economic model.


The USA Republic initially was a timocracy-isocracy democracy mix, with a monetized agrarian-barter economy. The USA Republic presently has a more plutocracy-timocracy democracy mix, with a flour-paper mashie economy. The USA Republic must mature into an isocracy democracy and a capitalist meritocracy economy with the Nations' wealth circulating and equally distributed across three standard deviations from the mean. IOW: All the wealth belongs to US. If you want to move to another country; then PLEASE, pack your bags and go. FACT: "We The People" do not need greedy wimps whining about their economic value to US.


Laissez-Faire, Laissez Rôle Dés a/o Bonne Chance, are irrational and dysfunctional economic models that dishonestly removes resources from economic circulation into a few private hands. Capitalism must be meritocracy (not aggregation) based and with considerations of needs national resources must be fairly distributed. Capital/resources hording has no merit in any economy, catastrophe, war ... unless some fanatical persons are seeking to incite civil unrest and commit treason.


Should I continue this δmuse ...?


# Eclectic

20150729

We do need a new version of capitalism for the jobless future?

Venture:  Information Determines Social Change and Technology Application.
  Legacy:  Technology Determines Social Change and Information Application.
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/wp/2015/07/20/we-need-a-new-version-of-capitalism-for-the-jobless-future
 
Modern capitalism, as was aristocratic feudalism, is based on the value associated with metal/property, goods/products, tender/money ....  There are alternatives, but human hubris does complicate the options; The Apt Question, Should we fear the final solution? 

Maybe a little fear will help US, EU ... UN others to sweep away the bequeathed extreme vertical/hierarchical culture for a far better civilization and finally achieve an isocracy governance of institutions/things that have encumbered people and nations with childlike fascination in splendid baubles and illustrious myths of gods, histories, rulers ....
 
Is there still merit in being you, helping others, creating better devices, music, math ... comfort, health, food ... education, science, guidance, sharing, governance ....  Basing value on what you do, what you can do, what you provide in a culture has actual merit far beyond the greedy amassing of faux-power and gluttonous voraciousness for pseudo-wealth.
 
We know; do we have the will, endurance and courage to make US, EU ... UN others better?
 
 
 
 
 
 

20150706

Information Architecture δMuse

Information Architecture [δMuse Comments/Notes, not edits/post]
               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_architecture (caused the δMuse visit)

Information Architecture (IA)
Information Services (Analysis, Simulations, Production, Libraries, Relationships, Collaboration ...)
               NOTE:  Security Defined by Information Object Governance and Structured Linkages
Information Management (Administration, Maintenance, Registries, Aggregation, Governance ...)
               NOTE:  Virtual Security Defined by Owners, Stakeholders, Creators, Purposes, Threats ...
Platforms/Systems (Linkages, Exchanges, Warehouses, Distributions, Infrastructure ...)
               NOTE:  Physical Security Defined by Monitoring, Restrictions, Stealth (DarkNameNetworks) ...
               ••• [Ellipsis usage indicates nothing is close-ended a/o presciently unchangeable]

IMO:  IA requirements must address IS, IM, and P/S, while leaving IM and P/S security issues appropriately partitioned.  IS must contain and transfer IM created content and data security requirements, while P/S must securely transport content and data. 
 
Information Sharing Environments (ISE)
Information Services (IS) Harmony (ISH) W3C, ISO ... Activity Specifics and Standards compliance
               Human Usage Content specific (Documents, Pictures, Books, Music, Movies, Government, Engineering ...)
               Machine Usage Data specific (Bits, Bytes, Sensors, Measures, Variables, Algorithms, Manufacturing ...)
               •••
Information Management (IM) Harmony (IMH) W3C, ISO ... Object Specifics and Standards compliance
               Product Objects are "WhatIs" (Books, Applications, Documents ... discrete and explicit artifacts)
               Process Objects are "HowTo" (Organization, Operations, Maps ... discrete and implicit artifacts)
               •••
Platforms/Systems (P/S) Conventions (P/SC) W3C, ISO ... Infrastructure Specifics and Standards compliance
               Open Internet, Intranet, a/o Public systems have Default Access Allowed (DAA)
               Closed Enterprise, Internal a/o Private systems have Default Access Denied (DAD)
               •••
               NOTE:  P/SC Open or Closed is an IA consideration for DAA or DAD. 
                            P/SC does not relate/dictate IA hardware/software ... physical/virtual products selection.  
                            P/SC does require DAA or DAD configuration of products for IA and P/S functional purposes.


The Objective Purpose for Information Architecture (IA)
Information Sharing Environment (ISE), AKA: Information Collaboration Environment (ICE)
               NOTE:  IS, IM, P/S ... Informatics with W3C, ISO ... Standards compliance
                            does supports IA requirements for an ISE. 

               NOTE:  Ontology is Information Science Theory / Implicit.  
                             Informatics is Applied Information Science / Explicit. 
                             For Theory / Implicit there are always HoHa support (IOW: a Hypothetical Precursor). 
                             For Application / Explicit there are always supporting Facts (IOW: a Theoretical Precursor). 
               Why is this important?  Application of a theory with reproducible results is a fact, but
                                                          Application of a hypothesis is risky with no predictable results. 


The Objective Purpose for Information Sharing Environments (ISE)
               Information Derivatives Foundations (IDF) for Communities, Colleagues, Families ...
               NOTE:  Information leveraged post maker development ... sensor collection, analysis, metadata,
                            storage ... then requires structured discovery, suitable assessment, useful aggregation,
                            derivative packaging, distribution/delivery ... to create and edit derivative information in an ISE.

 
The Objective Purpose for Information Derivatives:  Mission, Information Use/Reuse/Recycle....

20150701

What is the best BoS, BoA, BoFA ... Degree for future employment?

Maybe a Bachelor of Eclectics (BoE) Degree would be best.
 
IOW:  How best to select a future career in Mathematics, English (national language/culture), Physics, Biology, Music, Engineering, Arts, Programming, Medicine, Chemistry, Philosophy, Informatics, Anthropology ...?  Learn your basics (Math & English) and take two or three vaguely interesting courses in five or six fields of study. 

Probability is you will not have a career in any specific field, until you have your Masters or Doctors degree. So, for that BoS, BoA, BoFA ... degree, be curious and learn about everything (including comics, games, fun, friends ... life).  Even with your Masters or Doctors degree in a specific field, your future career requirements will always remain unknown; Expect, your BoE courses will be of surprising value over four to seven decades. 

When you get your BoE degree, then take an introspective (have more fun) vacation with your, end of vacation, goal being a decision to seek a job or a field. 

As you move into a career, learn explicit career specifics:  How to do a job?  What questions to ask?  What is the organization and functional structure?  What are organic a/o core processes, products, services?  ...?  Yes! Both, the job a/o the field must be approached with great curiosity for the unknowns that you need to work with and learn about.

Nothing will remain the same across years and decades; So, your lifecycle sustainment requires you to be autodidactic and curious about the next unknown in your life a/o career.  Best 1960s' life/ethos saying is "Keep On Moving On." 

Also, accept that bosses, managers, supervisors ... with a Bo* degree and no hands-on experience are frequently (not always) oppressive idiots that want you to find another job.  Best 1960s' career/ethic saying is "Keep On Moving On." 

Oh, most importantly, FAMILY (spouse and kids) comes first; So, do what is best for them and you. 

[Yes, I know there ain't a Bachelor of Eclectics degree. Though, IMO, there should be a BoE degree]

20150602

Adelophilia Sapiens are Anomic

Perhaps species differentiation is not as obvious as Neanderthals and Sapien primates.



20150520

The 21st Century Extrinsic or Distal Nihilist is an Existentialist?


Extrinsic [exotic, foreign, alien, actual ... as in Unknown] or Distal Nihilist:  All Human values are acquired, learned, derived ... and reveal the human condition. There are no Real Human Values (RHV) other than those parentally/socially imposed on children and perpetuated by proximal adults.  Actual Human Values (AHV) genetically exist.  AHV exist as part of evolution inheritance; Hence, we observe "Value" behaviors in other primates, mammals, and fish ... birds.  Ascription of human values to gods and fear of divinity, dogma ... fantasy retribution abandons reason and freewill; Thereby, enslaving the person to the contrived a/o conniving vaunted values of hubris persons. 

The Distal Nihilist understands unknown fears are irrational and natural.  Naturally (even for humans) unknowns will provoke curiosity, then the seeking to know the unknown.  These natural behaviors have been observed in puppies, kittens, infant primates ... and are essential to evolution.  Yes, babies are not practical they will try to hug a lion or pet an alligator; Therfor, elders (parents, siblings ...) provide practical lessons and inducements that mitigate the risk, which natural curiosity causes.  These practical lessons starts a lifecycle of unquestioning loyalty to family/community authority and an understanding of repercussions.  Guilt as the genetic component (as are most emotions) promotes greater conformity to social strictures.  Repercussions cause suppression (Fear) or repression (Reason) towards curiosity (an emotion).  Fear has real optional responses, then panic, faint, or run. Fear lacks actual Reason skills required within novel/anomalous environments.

Distal Nihilist are existentialist that dismiss the contrived and commonly accepted RHV as easy explanations that patronize persons of faith/myth communities. 

Why do I differentiate with the words "Real" and "Actual" in my discussion (with myself) about "Human Values," because my observations frequently explained value behavior discrepancies (by self and others) with a few sayings/quotes?

1.  Reality is self-induced hallucination.
2.  Reality ain't actuality.
3.  Reality is a personal affliction.
4.  Dogma affected persons cannot reason effective.

20150330

Governance of a functional economy

Governance is not "Government Intervention."  Governance of a functional economy, when done honestly by the markets (industry, banks, commerce, persons ...), not gamed for profits/greed, will not require "Government Intervention" to govern the economy.  
 
A healthy meritocracy economy, in a Democracy, provides a standard bell-shape-curve distribution of wealth, benefits, and quality of life (health, education, community [indigent...affluent] ...) inclusive fairness.  Markets' stewards (C*Os, BoTs, and groups/families) fail at ethical private-sector governance when income disparities exist, as indicated by a skewed wealth-curve of income, property, community....  When markets' stewards fail at economic governance, the results are depressions, recessions, resource diaspora....  When economic failures occur, "We The People" as a Government and community must ethically act and economically intervene for the welfare of the Nation.  For US (the public-sector) this is Governance, for the private-sector this is Government intervention/interference.

Economic failure upon failures is not an issue of negatives cancelling.  All failures are debt additive, until good (Private/Public) governance can liquidate the debt.  Present private-sector pseudo-capitalism relies on Government bailouts and protectionist laws (AKA: Corporate-Welfare Laws) that prevent private-sector corrections of functional economic incompetence.  Good public-sector Governance emplaces laws that control the private-sector participation in antitrust, monopolies, fraud, bribery... activities, which cause a dysfunctional economy with contemptible private-sector debt being shifted to the public sector. 

Government economic involvement/intervention is always caused by private-sector economic failures.  When a Government is the cause of economic failure, the private-sector will move to another country; Hence, The "National Security" interest in preventing private-sector manipulation of national politics and elections is essential to good governance and stable economy.  There is not much difference between private-sector fervor and religious faith, the irrational faith/fervor dogma is circular, and participation will debase Democratic Governments.  Beware all special fervor/faith interest with resolutions and truths, because they will not have verifiable/reproducible facts and solutions.

A nation's economic model must promote socio-economic balance or risk collapse.  An unbalanced cost of living burden on labor-hands [AKA: wage-slaves] offers XYZ... benefits, under faux-capitalism.  Market advocates will unethical and amoral cheer their good fortune without concern for National Interest or the public-sector impact and resultant debt.  Wealth disparity (US, EU, global ...) is an economic functional deficiency problem.  National resources/wealth removed from circulation in an economy assures some form of capital collapse within market sectors (S&L, Tech, Housing ...).  Governance is the method required to pump money into the failed economy with hope for economic stabilization that will eventually kick-start the functionally deficient economic model.

The USA Republic initially was a timocracy-isocracy democracy mix, with a monetized agrarian-barter economy.  The USA Republic presently has a more plutocracy-timocracy democracy mix, with a flour-paper mashie economy.  The USA Republic must mature into an isocracy democracy and a capitalist meritocracy economy with the Nations' wealth circulating.  IOW: All the wealth belongs to US.  If you want to move to another country; then PLEASE, pack your bags and go.  FACT: "We The People" do not need greedy wimps whining about their economic value to US.
 
Laissez-Faire, Laissez Rôle Dés a/o Bonne Chance, are irrational and dysfunctional economic models that dishonestly removes resources from economic circulation into a few private hands.  Capitalism must be meritocracy, not aggregation, based.  Capital/resources hording has no merit in any economy, unless some folks are seeking civil unrest without consideration of historical events.

20150311

Just a comment on new economics

Why: http://www.alternet.org/education/how-activist-college-kids-are-taking-high-priests-money

A new economics model must study and address the historical, present, and persistent economic problems.  A new model needs to emerge from present model failures/weaknesses, and have an objective economics system clearly defined providing the legacy to objective system lifecycle roadmap.  The lifecycle roadmap would be to assure that there is not another "sit on your laurels" model, because the objective system must always progressively mature and address socio-economic and human-cultural developments. 

IMO, a progressive economics model provides a commons for a society to reasonably distribute community (global...local) resources and wealth/value [1st] Welfare that universally delivers stability (food, housing, health, learning), [2nd] Enfranchisement that provides participatory meritocracy (justice, governance, occupation, options/opportunity), [3rd] Assurance that economics is building an egalitarian society (global...local).   

PseudoMarxist, FauxCapitalist, Classical/NeoClassical and other totalitarian oligarch economics (aristocracy, plutocracy, noocracy, epistocracy ...) are reliably consistent failures that lead to slavery, exploitation, corruption ....   

Future economics models require strong public participation, commitment, and governance.  Because, there will always be a few greed-sick micromaniacal plutocrats trying to by gods of wealth.

20150210

Gothic Geek, Freak, and Nerd Toddlers' Future Careers: Balisage Markup Conference

Why Go...Attend the Balisage Markup Conference?The world of tomorrow will pass you by like your grandparents in the 1980s, unless ....
1980s Workplace networks, computers, and software
1990s Home computers, modems, email, and web-browsers
2000...Present most politicians remain lost and intransigent C*O gophers
 
2020...Future most of US will benefit from Information, but only a few will know and do.
Revelation: Information [affect] induces implicit cultural change.
Reminisce: Technology [effect] enables explicit cultural change.
 
 
Extensible Markup XML / XHTML Language, W3C Standard
   http://www.w3.org/XML
Web Ontology Language (OWL), W3C Standard
   http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-rdf-owl
Unified Modeling Language, OMG Standard
   http://www.uml.org
Business Process Modeling Notation, OMG Standard
   http://www.bpmn.org
Universal Business Language, OASIS Standard
   http://ubl.xml.org
National Information Exchange Model, Standards Compliance W3C, OMG, ISO ...
   https://www.niem.gov
   http://www.omg.org/spec/NIEM-UML/1.0
 
Well, it is just IMO? Information (Digital/Computer) Sciences, Informatics, Library Sciences, Ontological Theory/Algorithms ... Information Sharing Environments (ISE) make US & EU strong, smart, and PDFC00!

20150209

Science Fiction Physics Course-110


The Standard Model [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model] of particle physics is a theory concerning the electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear interactions, as well as classifying all the subatomic particles known. It was developed throughout the latter half of the 20th century, as a collaborative effort of scientists around the world.[1] The current formulation was finalized in the mid-1970s upon experimental confirmation of the existence of quarks. Since then, discoveries of the top quark (1995), the tau neutrino (2000), and more recently the Higgs boson (2013), have given further credence to the Standard Model. Because of its success in explaining a wide variety of experimental results, the Standard Model is sometimes regarded as a "theory of almost everything".

Although the Standard Model is believed to be theoretically self-consistent[2] and has demonstrated huge and continued successes in providing experimental predictions, it does leave some phenomena unexplained and it falls short of being a complete theory of fundamental interactions. It does not incorporate the full theory of gravitation[3] as described by general relativity, or account for the accelerating expansion of the universe (as possibly described by dark energy). The model does not contain any viable dark matter particle that possesses all of the required properties deduced from observational cosmology. It also does not incorporate neutrino oscillations (and their non-zero masses).

The development of the Standard Model was driven by theoretical and experimental particle physicists alike. For theorists, the Standard Model is a paradigm of a quantum field theory, which exhibits a wide range of physics including spontaneous symmetry breaking, anomalies, non-perturbative behavior, etc. It is used as a basis for building more exotic models that incorporate hypothetical particles, extra dimensions, and elaborate symmetries (such as supersymmetry) in an attempt to explain experimental results at variance with the Standard Model, such as the existence of dark matter and neutrino oscillations.

The Standard Model of elementary particles, with the three generations of matter, gauge bosons in the fourth column, and the Higgs boson in the fifth.


SciFicPhyCrs110 ScienceFictionPhysics Course110 — This is not professional science anything, and dogma/godma fantasy is less authoritative. 

DarkEnergy is generated at the edges of TimeSpace.  DarkEnergy, in SpaceTime, is observable at our known universe edges and BlackHoles' event horizons.  Different manifestations of DarkEnergy occur as the Quantum-Horizon dissipates with TimeSpace.  All frequencies/waves are distorted/displaced by matter.  All frequencies/waves in TimeSpace are distorted/displaced by Micro-particles (atoms, molecules ...) and macro-objects (stars, planets ...).
 
SpaceTime is kept coherent by gravity.  DarkEnergy insulates/delays SpaceTime dissipation into the Quantum-Horizon.  Gravity makes SpaceTime coherent providing energy for quanta coalescing into atomic elements...universe.
 
The Quantum seeks a quiescent (smooth fabric) state, but energy is never inert, energy is a potential waiting for release, differences ….  A portion of the fabric knotted with potential, maybe nothing happens, maybe another knotted potential on the fabric creates a potential difference and a Singularity of energy released creating another Universe.  Maybe two Universes collide causing a Singularity.

More edit and ownership is needed, with fabled math skills, but SciFicPhy does not require proof or faith, just fun.

20150121

UX, HF, MaMa and People need far better ...?

Vision: Information [affect] induces implicit cultural change.
  View: Technology [effect] enables explicit cultural change.
   IOW: Technology ain’t Information. Technology exist because of Information.
I consider information a raw material for an ISE & NetNeutral future.
Information (Data/Content) products are the cargo transported on the Infrastructure Technology (IT) [AKA: Telecommunications Infrastructure]. Processes that produce information products [Data/Content/…] use information as a raw material. Data products are for machines, automation, simulations … science, engineering, industrial … consumption. Content products stories, reports, movies, music … are for human consumption (learning, entertainment …). Data and Content are information products created for and applied to needs/requirements. Are there other basic information products, IDNK? Information obtained by human or electronic sensors are raw until processed (collect, aggregate, analyze …) by automation or human core functions. So, IMO, there is no information symbiosis/processes. Technology symbiosis like industrial processes require information to be functional for performing requirements; Hence, data or content are basic information products transported as cargo on IT (as defined above).
UX/HF/MaMa… are data-derivative processes needed for designing digital/computer and personal interactivity. UserX (a person) is not the UX/HF/MaMa… or information. UserX intransigence (I think) is not due to information, processes, or technology. UserX intransigence (I suspect) is due to frustration with no durable or substantial improvement in work experience a/o environment. The UX/HF/MaMa… provides a product designed (environment, system, hardware, software …) experience, which is not a SME/Work environment experience. During my +30y work experience the environment has always been a Megalithic Human Inference Engine (MHIE) that morphs I/O by apparent caprice inducing errors, which requires a redo-recheck-loop. IMO: UserX intransigence is due to relearning the same SME/work experience for new IT products that result in the same SME/work environment and experience. Science Academia and industry Technology at present levels of capabilities can do far more than industry-only has provided to US.
Collapse of the MHIE technology will not be a crash, IT as defined today (IMO) can cause a catastrophic failure for US (not just a system crash). Our focus on IT as defined today for security (information assurance) has been IMO a failure, because (IMO) the focus should be on “Information Governance” for security of the information.
ISO, W3C, OASIS, IEEE …, Open…Agile concepts … standards/protocols/specifications compliance does solve information interoperability and infrastructure integration requirements. Lack of forced compliance across hardware, software, services, and industry providers causes ISE … extensible lifecycle sustainment and innovation havoc for US (IMO).
Industry (the creators) frequently provides what is required with hooks, warts, and nightmares for the sustainment lifecycle follow-ons. We get what we pay for, which IMO is always less than we need for an innovative strategic lifecycle.

‘With all the varieties of program languages, service busses, signals, and the disparate user base (from novice to super experts, and everything in between...). The mysterious middle-ware provided by the Captains of Industry (CoI) in their interest as the Centers of Influence. IT is bound to get threating-cloudy and war-foggy.’ ISO, W3C … standards compliance resolves even these problems at the point of I/O for data/content information products and often at the point of committed-action.
Cyber-warfare two basic components Infrastructure Security and Information Governance. I suspect that solid Information Governance could sometimes prevent infrastructure breaches. Cyber-warfare is an infrastructure attack, but an information spill, is just bad information governance. Cyber-attacks on industry and government IMO have little noticeable impact on the public. Cyber-attacks IMO do cause politicians and industry to write unenforceable cyber-laws that create criminals and do little to stop cyber-crime/attacks. Government and industry cyber-sloth (easy not better) solutions do cause internet-access and web-services disruptions.
POTUS SOTU stand on Net-Neutrality is of interest. Net-Neutrality protects US from TelCo & CableCo Internet Access Provider (IAP) domination of UserX and Internet Services Providers (ISP) like libraries, news, entertainment, banks …. IAPs charge monthly/yearly internet data-rate fees, which can increase on a whim. ISPs and UserX pay their agreed upon data-rate utility fees for homes and businesses. When ISP or UserX want a higher data-rate (more upload/download bandwidth) they will pay higher fees. The IAPs (IMO) just want to run another swindle on US. Most of the POTUS SOTU stands on social and economic topics, I already knew.

20150106

Future/History: The transition process a/o nexus may happen in many possible ways.

The transition process a/o nexus may happen in many possible ways. The episodic human culture transition events, in history, have been heroically and tragically poignant or surrealistically unremarkable surprises. IOW: Sometimes the most documented person/event is insignificant to what happened next. Example: Hitler and Napoleon are well-documented megalomaniacs, but both are very inconsequential to human culture advancements beyond their plus/minus 100 years. Example: Gutenberg’s Printing Press or Aristotle’s Alchemy prime-mater and elements/states. Gutenberg delivered significant cultural advancements well in to this digital publishing age (Plus 600 years). Aristotle (and others in India-Math, China-black powder …) started the theoretical math, physics…astronomy and applied engineering…chemistry sciences (Aristotle Plus 2400 years). Primary/Public schools globally and historically teach local cultural-political history [Who smote whom, in the last war or political …?]. Rome: Gloria Fluxa – Today: Glory is fleeting is the summary for the above examples [http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Sallust].
The transition process from the present labor-intensive production and feudal economy variants [AKA: Capitalism, Communism …] will be frequently disruptive (change), but not necessarily destructive (war). Humans are very adaptable to change (adjust/comply), but intransigent when threatened (flight/fight). Aristotle and Gutenberg, with shared reason, helped us adjust and comply with actualities in human history. Alexander and Stalin, by shared threat, dictated authoring of history/documents and murdered many people. I sometimes think we are taught from a very young age that blood-lust is the only way to fame and fortune (Why?).
Okay, having stated (above) the looming reality. How do we (globally) transition from the present-threat to the post-scarcity culture and economy? Very carefully with meticulous planning, that requires species-preservation altruistic governance by pluralist-democracy [not republic-democracy]. If we had time, I would say colonize the Moon and Mars before forming a pluralist-democracy, but some research suggest that we may be very short on time, due to climate and natural resources (water, iron …).
Rather than continuing this run-on SciFic alternate-culture …. Let me know, if you/others want me to continue. I am getting old … it would take me many breaks and days to get to the probable two beginnings/endings.
I hope and expect the best, but I never ignore any probable. Best of all, if it ain't the best, I'll be dead of old age before the worst happens (I hate seeing folks suffer!).

20141229

Why not ... Double-Blind Justice?


In DoubleBlind-Justice:

(1) The Grand Jury works a docket (prioritized on severity of infractions Treason, Murder, Slavery, Torture, Corruption … Fraud, Theft, DWI …) of all arrest without accessing non-relevant information (age, sex, race, religion, cultural heritage, socio economic background, past criminal record …).

(2) Trial Jury, Defenders and Prosecutors, and Judges do not know non-relevant information (age, sex, race …) of persons on trial a/o victims of crime.

(3) All public sessions (Deliberations, Trial, Sentencing … proceedings) are viewable by Trial Jury, Defenders, Prosecutors, Judges, and remote-viewable by Defendants and Victims.

(4) Only after all proceeding are final, can persons (criminal and victim) identity/information be publically released and used by news/broadcast/….

(5) The Innocent (Non-Guilty) suspect and jury, victims, and public members identity/personal information cannot be used by public record a/o by news/broadcast/….

(6) Double-Blind extensible application (determined by) to unique locations, persons, and conditions.  IOW:  Judges, Prosecutors, Killer-Cops and Cop-Killers are treated equally in an intelligent, unbiased, and blind justice system.

(7) ...?

20141215

The Whitehouse Coup by the Gang Of Plutocrats (GOP) in 1933 is still alive in the USA

The Whitehouse Coup 1933

Document uncovers details of a planned coup in the USA in 1933 by right-wing American oligarchs and plutocrats. The alleged plotters were from famous American oligarchs’ families and companies (Heinz, Birds Eye, Goodtea, Maxwell House, Prescott Bush George’s Grandfather, Ford, Lindbergh …) believed that the USA should adopt the policies of Hitler and Mussolini. The coup aimed to topple POTUS Franklin D Roosevelt with the help of half-a-million war veterans.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/document/document_20070723.shtml 
http://bit.ly/1svooeu

The Whitehouse Coup never ended, no traitors prosecuted/executed, and GOP keeps hope alive for The National Security State toppling Pluralist Democracy for US.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-engelhardt/the-national-security-state_b_6326658.html 
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/06/snowden-lessons-security-state

A republic governed by a pluralist democracy is rational.
A republic governed by an oligarchy democracy is dogmatic.

20141201

To: All Technology BizBuzz Acronym Dominions (BBAD)

Putting responsibility on the end user is Luddite-101 Silly.

To say: “Who knows better than the user what information is important to them?” is a smart way to avoid responsibility and blame-storm after failures.

Too say: “What better way to share that information than to own it yourself?” ignores the communal scope of collaboration, standards, and interoperability in Information Sharing Environments (ISE).

Telecommunications — AKA: Internet, AKA: Infrastructure — Integration: Internet Access Provided (IAP) — Against Net-Neutrality
W3S — WorldWideWeb Services — Interoperability: Internet Services Provider (ISP) — Pro Net-Neutrality

NOTE: User/Internet connection into the infrastructure by an IAP requires Standards compliant PHYSICAL integration (includes wireless/radio links) for flawless communications.
NOTE: Services require Standardized VIRTUAL interoperability to deliver flawless services (web, phone, email, VTC ...) across the internet connections.
NOTE: Standards exist to make FLAWLESS possible for all USERS (.Gov, .Mil, .Com ...).
NOTE: HUA is an acronym pronounced “HooYah!” HUA is not the HUYA BBAD acronym. Such as; You got your HUYA if you think Standards do not dominate all acronym dominions.

IM — Information Management
CM — Content Management (XML)
DM — Data Management (GIEA)
RM — Records Management

KM — Knowledge Management
PM — Process/Procedure Management (UML/BUML)
OM — Operations Management

LS — Library Science
IS — Information Science
...

If you do not know how “Standards” and the above acronyms relate to FLAWLESS functionality a/o think any of the above acronyms mean the same thing, then PLEASE go back to school before you muck many things up (IMO).

 

20141117

What's the difference between gun-nuts and US?

A gun owner is not a gun-nut.  A member of the NRA is not a militia member.  I am a gun owner and a USMC (69...71) veteran, but I ain’t a member of the NRA.  I do go to shooting clubs/ranges, and I have been deer and dove hunting.

Gun-nut militia members do have agendas, rights, and rhetoric, but no reason; Hence, "Gun-nut" is a correct description, though politically and psychologically incorrect, of people that sometimes belong to a militant militia within the USA.  I consider all gun-nuts and militia members a threat to US in public and private places (like banks, work, restaurants, schools, movies ... hunting, traveling ...).  

Gun owners (like me) and NRA members should patriotically (like veterans) be interested in preventing gun-nut ownership of weapons, and fully support the disbandment and prosecution of militant militia members/groups that have documented or recorded militant agenda and rhetoric seeking the violent overthrow of The USA Government. 

As long as our VOTE and RIGHTS (gun ownership) are secure and protected, militant militias are not acceptable to US.  I know the facts; too many dead innocents and victims, there are many (a majority) gun owners everywhere in the USA.  I choose, because of (mainly recent) US history, to oppose the NRA their members that use dead innocents and victims as justification for arming gun-nuts and militias, and as excuses for supporting radical gun-nut/militant rhetoric and fear mongering.

I once heard a Jesuit and Rabbi (agree on) say there are two commandments one was about gods and the other was about some golden rule covering the other nine.

I can say (I think, the Jesuit and Rabbi would agree) all RIGHTS in The Constitution of The United States are covered by The RIGHT to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

20141103

NRA Gun-nuts' militia rights agenda harms US.

I never advocate waiting for first responders, do something appropriate, saving lives is good; playing gun-nut hero is bad!  Gun-nut attacks on “prepared and unsuspecting” first responders, children, and citizens is the carnage wreaked upon armed and unarmed people in the USA.  NRA gun-nuts’ militia rights are a dogmatic red-herring by plutocrats, fools, politicians ... to distract US from our duties as citizens, which are protect People and Rights (not just gun-nut interpreted rights). NRA gun-nuts are  plutocrats' fools and politicians ... distracting US from our duties as citizens to build a better US with education, healthcare, infrastructure, innovation, jobs ....

Disarming/restricting gun-nut owners/militias, of our right, to carry weapons is responsible protection of US who are responsable gun owners.  Sadly, NRA gun-nuts don't like the majority of US insisting on responsible behavior in the exercise of USA Citizen Rights.

The discussion about gun carry in/out of town is not squelched. You have many places to voice the gun-nut theory of all USA Civil Rights; So, go and preach in your own house, or the NRA Gun-nuts Militia convention where weapons are not allowed, the NRA does not allow Gun-nuts’ rights in their country/convention.

Gun-nuts' militias and the NRA are disgustingly supporting gun-nuts’ rights that kill and infringe on first responders', children's, and citizens' legitimate USA Constitutional Civil Rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. 

I would not discuss this topic with any gun-nut anyplace, it would be like discussing science with a creationist, a waste of both our time. Yep, it might get me shot by a gun-nut.

Gun-nuts’ agenda, rights, and rhetoric make US the casualties, while those of us who are willing to do something good are insulted by gun-nuts’ reasoning for killing first responders, children, and citizens. 

As a person who has served in the USMC (69...71) deployed as a DoD civilian (DS/DS 91), and spent years overseas, I will not threaten others by supporting NRA gun-nuts’ rights, laws, agenda in the USA.  I have taken action to protect other, from death and physical harm, in foreign countries and the USA. 

Taking chances by saving folks should be our commitment to US.  The NRA gun-nuts’ rights campaign is killing US.  Unfortunately, those of you who follow the plutocratic NRA guy-nuts’ rights propaganda do "whine" attempting to deny US  our USA Constitutional Civil Rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

20141006

Civilizations' Disruptive Tehnologies

     Disruptive Manufacturing:  Customized, Curio, and Massive “Cottage Industry” potential does prove we can Change, we can Make, we can be Better, more Open and extremely Agile (maybe forget Foreign Imports and Military Sales).  If there is a global “AAA” Threat of Atypical (no prior example), Asymmetric (uneven impact), Asynchronous (not when, where, what dependent) manufacturing industry, then either a boon-boom or threat-boom exist to US, EU, RU, CN, IN ... IMO.
     Disruptive Leveraging of Distributed Manufacturing:  Distributed/Local production a/o manufacturing is a decentralized Enterprises of Interest (EoI) model that can use a network of geographically dispersed manufacturing facilities (homes, schools, hospitals ...) that are coordinated using telecommunications (Cell, WWWeb ...) for just-in-time production and logistics (There are WWII Vietnam ... examples).
     When the AAA threat cannot be mitigated (as in WWII, Vietnam ...) then you (US, EU ...) must lead the future of “Disruptive Manufacturing” AAA Boon-Boom.  The “AAA” Threat (IMO) cannot be addressed by present national/international governments/laws, military, economic, social structures ...; Hence, national/international ... structures, institutions, strategy, tactics ... change will happen (I hope) by and for US.  NOTE:  I could be wrong and this is all a SciFic-101 book/lesson/movie concept.

Disruptive Manufacturing Technology Enabler:  “Arduino” [https://twitter.com/arduino] is an open-source electronics platform based on easy-to-use hardware and software. It's intended for anyone making interactive projects.  The Arduino Board senses the environment by receiving inputs from many sensors, and affects its surroundings by controlling lights, motors, and other actuators.  The Arduino Software can tell your Arduino maker product what to do, by writing code in the Arduino programming language and using the Arduino development environment.  Arduino developer kits and software programming interface make it easier for artists, designers and other do-it-yourself enthusiasts – who often don’t have technical backgrounds – to create interactive objects or environments.  The community of Arduino enthusiasts is vast, and includes region specific groups and special interest groups.  http://www.arduino.cc/

Disruptive Manufacturing Technology Enabler:  “SparkFun” [https://twitter.com/sparkfun] is an online retail store that sells the parts and devices to make your electronics projects possible. Whether it's a robot that can cook your breakfast or a GPS cat tracking device, SparkFun products and resources are designed to make the world of electronics more accessible. In addition to products, SparkFun also offers classes and online tutorials to help educate individuals in the wonderful world of embedded electronics.  https://www.sparkfun.com/

Disruptive Manufacturing Technology Enabler:  “LittleBits” [https://twitter.com/littleBits] is making hardware limitless and has one mission: to put the power of electronics in the hands of everyone. littleBits makes a library of electronic modules that snap together with magnets to allow anyone to learn, build, and invent with electronics—no soldering, wiring, or programming required. The company was founded in 2011 by MIT Media Lab graduate, TED Senior Fellow, and cofounder of the Open Hardware Summit, Ayah Bdeir.  http://littlebits.cc

Disruptive Manufacturing Technology Enabler:  “Adafruit” [https://twitter.com/adafruit] founded in 2005 by MIT engineer, Limor Fried.  Her goal was to create the best place online for learning electronics and making the best designed products for makers of all ages and skill levels.  Adafruit has tools, equipment and electronics that are personally selected, tested and approved before going in to the Adafruit store.  Limor Fried was the first female engineer on the cover of WIRED magazine and was recently awarded Entrepreneur magazine's Entrepreneur of the year.  http://www.adafruit.com 

Disruptive Manufacturing Technology Enabler:  “3DPrint” [https://twitter.com/3dprintindustry] is a process for making a three-dimensional object in any shape of any material from a computer based data source where successive layers are applied to make the product.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_printing

Additional “Maker” Information:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maker_culture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maker_movement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_design
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fablab
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackerspace
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MakerBot_Industries
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_manufacturing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maker_Faire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructivism_(philosophy_of_education)

Asymmetric warfare is the least of our worries. What about asymmetric industry, logistics, fielding, training in a theater of operations? We will not be able to order parts/weapons and filed innovations from home fast enough in the future battlefields.  Don’t worry US, EU, RU, CN ... industry have the same problems. NOTE: Small companies and underdeveloped countries have a cottage-industry potential to leap-ahead of our megalithic stovepipe institutional cultures.