What's the difference between gun-nuts and US?

A gun owner is not a gun-nut.  A member of the NRA is not a militia member.  I am a gun owner and a USMC (69...71) veteran, but I ain’t a member of the NRA.  I do go to shooting clubs/ranges, and I have been deer and dove hunting.

Gun-nut militia members do have agendas, rights, and rhetoric, but no reason; Hence, "Gun-nut" is a correct description, though politically and psychologically incorrect, of people that sometimes belong to a militant militia within the USA.  I consider all gun-nuts and militia members a threat to US in public and private places (like banks, work, restaurants, schools, movies ... hunting, traveling ...).  

Gun owners (like me) and NRA members should patriotically (like veterans) be interested in preventing gun-nut ownership of weapons, and fully support the disbandment and prosecution of militant militia members/groups that have documented or recorded militant agenda and rhetoric seeking the violent overthrow of The USA Government. 

As long as our VOTE and RIGHTS (gun ownership) are secure and protected, militant militias are not acceptable to US.  I know the facts; too many dead innocents and victims, there are many (a majority) gun owners everywhere in the USA.  I choose, because of (mainly recent) US history, to oppose the NRA their members that use dead innocents and victims as justification for arming gun-nuts and militias, and as excuses for supporting radical gun-nut/militant rhetoric and fear mongering.

I once heard a Jesuit and Rabbi (agree on) say there are two commandments one was about gods and the other was about some golden rule covering the other nine.

I can say (I think, the Jesuit and Rabbi would agree) all RIGHTS in The Constitution of The United States are covered by The RIGHT to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.