Gun-nut militia members do have agendas,
rights, and rhetoric, but no reason; Hence, "Gun-nut" is a correct description,
though politically and psychologically incorrect, of people that sometimes
belong to a militant militia within the USA.
I consider all gun-nuts and militia members a threat to US in public and
private places (like banks, work, restaurants, schools, movies ... hunting,
traveling ...).
Gun owners (like me) and NRA members should
patriotically (like veterans) be interested in preventing gun-nut ownership of
weapons, and fully support the disbandment and prosecution of militant militia members/groups
that have documented or recorded militant agenda and rhetoric seeking the
violent overthrow of The USA Government.
As long as our VOTE and RIGHTS (gun ownership) are
secure and protected, militant militias are not acceptable to US. I know the facts; too many dead innocents and
victims, there are many (a majority) gun owners everywhere in the USA. I choose, because of (mainly recent) US
history, to oppose the NRA their members that use dead innocents and victims as
justification for arming gun-nuts and militias, and as excuses for supporting
radical gun-nut/militant rhetoric and fear mongering.
I once heard a Jesuit and Rabbi (agree on) say there
are two commandments one was about gods and the other was about some golden rule
covering the other nine.
I can say (I think, the Jesuit and Rabbi would
agree) all RIGHTS in The Constitution of The United States are covered by The
RIGHT to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
